1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. alt.bbs.synchronet

  • More @ Codes

    From John@john@JCBBS.remove-far-this to All on Sat Dec 5 17:33:19 2020
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

    Hi There:

    Any chance of getting the below implemented?

    @MSG_THREAD_ID@ msg_thread_id number 3.16 message thread identifier (0 if unknown)
    @MSG_THREAD_BACK@ msg_thread_back number 3.12 message thread, back message number
    @MSG_THREAD_NEXT@ msg_thread_next number 3.10 message thread, next message number
    @MSG_THREAD_FIRST@ msg_thread_first number 3.10 message thread, message number of

    Thanks,
    John

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ JCBBS what an unoriginal name:)
    --- Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
    * Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
    --- Synchronet 3.19c-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From The Millionaire@the.millionaire@vert.synchro.net.remove-7a-this to John on Sat Dec 5 16:17:15 2020
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

    To: John

    Hi There:

    Any chance of getting the below implemented?

    @MSG_THREAD_ID@ msg_thread_id number 3.16 message thread identifier (0 if unknown)
    @MSG_THREAD_BACK@ msg_thread_back number 3.12 message thread, back message number
    @MSG_THREAD_NEXT@ msg_thread_next number 3.10 message thread, next message number
    @MSG_THREAD_FIRST@ msg_thread_first number 3.10 message thread, message number of

    Thanks,
    John

    ---
    â–  Synchronet â–  JCBBS what an unoriginal name:)


    I totally agree 100%. Good ideas.

    $ The Millionaire $
    --- Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
    * Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
    --- Synchronet 3.19c-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Netsurge@netsurge@1:229/101.remove-ssx-this to The Millionaire on Sat Dec 5 22:55:38 2020
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

    To: The Millionaire
    I totally agree 100%. Good ideas.

    You have absolutely no idea what you are agreeing too.

    |15frank |08// |15netsurge
    |07disksh0p|08!|07bbs |08% |07bbs.diskshop.ca |08% |07mystic goodness |11SciNet |03ftn hq |08% |07https://scinet-ftn.org

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2020/11/23 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: % disksh0p!bbs % bbs.diskshop.ca % SciNet ftn hq % (1:229/101)
    --- Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
    * Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
    --- Synchronet 3.19c-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Nightfox@nightfox@DIGDIST.remove-dr6-this to John on Sat Dec 5 20:08:10 2020
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

    To: John
    Re: More @ Codes
    By: John to All on Sat Dec 05 2020 05:33 pm

    Any chance of getting the below implemented?

    @MSG_THREAD_ID@ msg_thread_id number 3.16 message thread identifier (0 if unknown) @MSG_THREAD_BACK@ msg_thread_back number 3.12 message thread, back message number @MSG_THREAD_NEXT@ msg_thread_next number 3.10 message thread, next message number @MSG_THREAD_FIRST@ msg_thread_first number 3.10 message thread, message number of

    I would assume the 3.16, 3.12, and 3.10 are the version of Synchronet where those were introduced, suggesting they're already implemented.. Are they not working?

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
    --- Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
    * Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
    --- Synchronet 3.19c-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Digital Man@digital.man@vert.synchro.net.remove-bjx-this to Nightfox on Sat Dec 5 20:33:49 2020
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

    To: Nightfox
    Re: More @ Codes
    By: Nightfox to John on Sat Dec 05 2020 08:08 pm

    Re: More @ Codes
    By: John to All on Sat Dec 05 2020 05:33 pm

    Any chance of getting the below implemented?

    @MSG_THREAD_ID@ msg_thread_id number 3.16 message thread identifier (0 if unknown) @MSG_THREAD_BACK@ msg_thread_back number 3.12 message thread, back message number @MSG_THREAD_NEXT@ msg_thread_next number 3.10 message thread, next message number @MSG_THREAD_FIRST@ msg_thread_first number 3.10 message thread, message number of

    I would assume the 3.16, 3.12, and 3.10 are the version of Synchronet where those were introduced, suggesting they're already implemented.. Are they not working?

    I think he was pasting from the jsobjs.html.
    --
    digital man

    Synchronet "Real Fact" #38:
    Synchronet first supported Windows NT-based operating systems w/v3.00b (2000). Norco, CA WX: 60.3øF, 21.0% humidity, 1 mph SSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
    * Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
    --- Synchronet 3.19c-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From John@john@JCBBS.remove-1m8-this to Nightfox on Sun Dec 6 07:08:07 2020
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

    To: Nightfox
    Re: More @ Codes
    By: Nightfox to John on Sat Dec 05 2020 08:08 pm

    Re: More @ Codes
    By: John to All on Sat Dec 05 2020 05:33 pm

    Any chance of getting the below implemented?

    @MSG_THREAD_ID@ msg_thread_id number 3.16 message thread identifier (0 if unknown) @MSG_THREAD_BACK@
    msg_thread_back number 3.12 message thread, back message number @MSG_THREAD_NEXT@ msg_thread_next
    number 3.10 message thread, next message number @MSG_THREAD_FIRST@ msg_thread_first number 3.10
    message
    thread, message number of

    I would assume the 3.16, 3.12, and 3.10 are the version of Synchronet where those were introduced,
    suggesting they're already implemented.. Are they not working?

    Nightfox

    Good Morning:

    No they weren't, until Rob released them yesterday.

    Thanks
    John

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ JCBBS what an unoriginal name:)
    --- Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
    * Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
    --- Synchronet 3.19c-Linux NewsLink 1.113