1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. alt.bbs.synchronet

  • Do you prefer the HTML web interface or Webv4 interface?

    From Tenbucket@tenbucket@SUNNET.remove-n4x-this to alt.bbs.synchronet on Wed Nov 18 00:07:45 2020
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

    To:
    Not sure which I should trust the most

    1: HTML/JS
    2: Webv4
    3: I only use SSH/Telnet
    --- Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
    * Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
    --- Synchronet 3.19c-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Mortifis@mortifis@ALLEYCAT.remove-q48-this to Tenbucket on Wed Nov 18 07:17:13 2020
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

    To: Tenbucket
    Trust is a relative thing; trust what exactly?

    I use both runemaster web ui as well as webv4 ui, though webv4 is the more robust of the two, especially for modding web scripts. I also use telnet/ssh/rlogin, but the question is compare rune-master/webv4.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ AlleyCat! BBS Lake Echo, NS Canada
    --- Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
    * Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
    --- Synchronet 3.19c-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Nightfox@nightfox@DIGDIST.remove-4k4-this to Tenbucket on Wed Nov 18 09:48:42 2020
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

    To: Tenbucket
    Re: Do you prefer the HTML web interface or Webv4 interface?
    By: Tenbucket to on Wed Nov 18 2020 12:07 am

    Not sure which I should trust the most

    1: HTML/JS [5 55.56%] û
    2: Webv4 [4 44.44%] û

    uhh.. The webv4 interface uses HTML and JavaScript, so I'm not sure what this question means. What are you referring to by the "HTML/JS" interface here?

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
    --- Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
    * Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
    --- Synchronet 3.19c-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Mortifis@mortifis@ALLEYCAT.remove-ke1-this to Nightfox on Wed Nov 18 14:31:00 2020
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

    To: Nightfox
    uhh.. The webv4 interface uses HTML and JavaScript, so I'm not sure what this question means. What are you referring to by the "HTML/JS" interface here?

    Nightfox

    I figured he meant 'preference' between the stock runmaster (../web/root) vs webv4 (../webv4/root)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ AlleyCat! BBS Lake Echo, NS Canada
    --- Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
    * Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
    --- Synchronet 3.19c-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Tracker1@tracker1@TRN.remove-l4c-this to Tenbucket on Thu Nov 19 14:33:41 2020
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

    To: Tenbucket
    On 11/17/2020 10:07 PM, Tenbucket wrote:
    Not sure which I should trust the most

    1: HTML/JS
    2: Webv4
    3: I only use SSH/Telnet

    HTTPS with either HTML/JS or Webv4 is probably the "safest". I think, assuming you've setup/enabled the Let's Encrypt functionality, it should likewise be a trustworthy cert for NNTP as well though.

    SSH is fine if you trust the initial connection and Telnet is inherently insecure.

    Still wish a few clients (like SyncTERM) supported a websocket endpoint
    for RLogin.
    --
    Michael J. Ryan
    tracker1 +o Roughneck BBS
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - roughneckbbs.com
    --- Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
    * Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
    --- Synchronet 3.19c-Linux NewsLink 1.113