So I was going to mount an external NFS to /mnt/somewhere and backup
that way, but have since learned that its not suggested or supported by ProxMox Backup Server... I now know.
I'm still in the Vmware world, been looking at proxmox as a replacement. Just haven't really done it yet.
I just purchased a Synology 920+ a couple months back and moved my VM backups to the Synology Backup software.
None of this suggests anything, but possibly purchasing a NAS and
setting up NFS that way would be a better option? You'll get more then a backup server but a full NAS.
How does that work? So you run VMware on top of whatever machine/system you're using at the house, and then just load the virtual hard drives
from your NAS?
Well I do have a large NAS, a ProxMox server (with all the production VMs inside that need to be backed up..), and several other systems around the house... Home Assistant, an iMac, etc etc... my PBS backup server backs all of those up; including the NAS.
However, I do want to get a better NAS setup. While I'll probably build my Synology machines really look nice.
niter3 wrote to paulie420 <=-
I'm still in the Vmware world, been looking at proxmox as a
replacement. Just haven't really done it yet.
I just purchased a Synology 920+ a couple months back and moved my VM backups to the Synology Backup software.
paulie420 wrote to niter3 <=-
However, I do want to get a better NAS setup. While I'll probably build
my own, Synology machines really look nice.
I have a DS1621xs+ and it roxx, it runs all my dockers. About 20 dockers,
Synology NAS seem like a good fit if that's all you're running - it's
got mail servers, collaboration servers, DNS servers, VPN servers, even support for running docker containers - all of which I'd rather spin a
VM or container on Proxmox to support.
It has it's own backup tool called "Active Backup for Business". It's pretty damn easy to setup. You just add a the vmware hypervisor type in your credentials, and magic. It sees your VM's. You give it a schedule
and a location to backup to.
I'm not familiar with PBS. I just backup everything to my Synology. VM's as I mentioned, plus I setup the Synology so I can do mac backups using Time Machine.
I have a DS1621xs+ and it roxx, it runs all my dockers. About 20 dockers, including World of Warcraft server. No hickups, 24/7 service. The thing with Synology is it just works. But dont get any low end products.
I got two wildcard domains with LetsCert set up, and all dockers and
board can be reached with the proper subdomains, with SSL.
Synology gets a lot of hate from consumer market as they have vendor
lock in hard drives, memory etc etc. But from a more business
perspective they guarantee it works with those components.
Overpriced? Yes, definately-- for me it was between time and
productivity. And productivity won.
Derp, I understand... I thought you were saying you ran the VMs from yer NAS. I totally get it now.
PBS is like 2nd backup level - it only backs up... ultimately I want to run it off-site.
I have a DS1621xs+ and it roxx, it runs all my dockers. About 20 dockHow do you think this compares to the 920+. This is what I have.
Yea, that machine looks awesome - odd that it only comes w/ 8GB of RAM, wh is plenty for a NAS, but you got 20 containers running... did you upgrade I see the max is 32GB.
Overpriced? Yes, definately-- for me it was between time and productivity. And productivity won.
I don't necessarily think so, altho their pricing is a little odd;
empty - $1599
I have a DS1621xs+ and it roxx, it runs all my dockers. About 20 dockHow do you think this compares to the 920+. This is what I have.
I'm still in the Vmware world, been looking at proxmox as a replaceme Just haven't really done it yet.
I just purchased a Synology 920+ a couple months back and moved my VM backups to the Synology Backup software.
How does that work? So you run VMware on top of whatever machine/system you're using at the house, and then just load the virtual hard drives
from your NAS?
However, I do want to get a better NAS setup. While I'll probably build
my own, Synology machines really look nice.
pAULIE42o
.........
niter3 wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Synology NAS seem like a good fit if that's all you're running - it's
got mail servers, collaboration servers, DNS servers, VPN servers, even support for running docker containers - all of which I'd rather spin a
VM or container on Proxmox to support.
I have the 920+ with 8gb of memory. I found their vm solution was just
to slow.
Paulie, if you are interested in Synology, google Xpenology it is basically a Synology NAS on a real computer. I have a real Synology
which handles my in house stuff, but I took an old computer I had, put
32 gigs of Ram in it with 4TB of HD in it, I installed Proxmox on it,
then installed a Xpenology VM on it, I use that one to back up my BBS'
and as a File Server as it stores my File Libraries. Every other day,
the Xpenology backs up the HD's to the real Synology so I have a backup
of that.. My BBS' are on a seperate VLan from my in house set up so it works real well for me as my BBS' can not access my in house LAN but my
in house LAN can access my BBS Lan..
Ahhhh; now this sounds right up my alley. I currently use
OpenMediaVault, and its great... but was thinking of using
TrueNAS/FreeNAS for the next build - but will sniff Xpenology; it sounds like it might be a contender.
Sysop: | Chris Crash |
---|---|
Location: | Huntington Beach, CA. |
Users: | 577 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 61:28:17 |
Calls: | 10,734 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 5 |
Messages: | 442,632 |