Re: Re: Clrghouz update
By: Avon to deon on Sun Jul 30 2023 01:28 pm
I did get a number of these sent to 1/101 saying I was not allowed to post to the fsxNet echos :)
Happy to be a tester for this.
Oops :)
Yeah, I noticed that the address I was testing against was the originator of the echomail, not the packet that sent it too me ;)
I fixed that last night.
You can try a few things if you want, and make sure you get a response back:
* Send a packet with an incorrect packet password,
* Send a packet to an echo area that doesnt exist,
* Send one to an existing one that you dont have permission, eg: FSX_DIY
* Send a message to an echo that you havent subscribed to
(In each case you should get a netmail back).
I'm going to enable my "pi" build, so that the clrghouz container can be run on a PI. How much memory does your PI have? My biggest doubts at the moment is memory consumption especially when the number of echomails stored start to increase (and the number of nodes increases) - since I'm recording each seenby seperatly (so I can do some stats).
I want to optimise memory/consumption, its something I've put off, but I have everything else in place now that it is the next thing to do to tune...
...лоеп
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)