I have decided to switch to Parabola GNU/Linux.
The reason for doing this is because as a developer I need the latest available packages and Parabola (being an Arch-based distribution) has
this wonderful gift. I just checked tonight that the version of python
tney have available on their package server is the same as the latest version available from python.org; so that's great.
I will be learning how to use the package manager, pacman, tonight as I
have always been an apt-get guy.
To install: pacman --sync seamonkey
Oh, and to update all of the packages: pacman --sync --refresh
--refresh --sysupgrade
Re: I have decided to switch to Parabola GNU/Linux.
By: Deavmi to DOVE-Net.Unix on Wed Dec 14 2016 09:03 pm
I have decided to switch to Parabola GNU/Linux.
The reason for doing this is because as a developer I need the latest available packages and Parabola (being an Arch-based distribution) has this wonderful gift. I just checked tonight that the version of python tney have available on their package server is the same as the latest version available from python.org; so that's great.
I will be learning how to use the package manager, pacman, tonight as I have always been an apt-get guy.
I would be interested to see what your thoughts are on Parabola GNU/Linux. I just looked at it briefly (just their website) and I see that AUR is not supported; which is interesting for it being a variant of Arch Linux.
For me, I would like to have access to the AUR to get packages that Arch Linux
does not have available on their mainstream repositories; probably why Manjaro
works out well for me.
For me being a former RPM person, I kind of find it weird to use pacman for a while.
To install: pacman --sync seamonkey
To update the package cache: pacman --sync --refresh --refresh
No, that is not a typo or an accidential repeat. The "refresh" parameter has to be included twice. And yes, at least for Arch Linux and Manjaro, package cache will need to be updated from time to time (otherwise, you might get a 404
error).
Oh, and to update all of the packages: pacman --sync --refresh --refresh --sysupgrade
That command will update the package cach and then performan the updates against all of the packages.
Yea... Pacman is interesting, and it looks like Parabola GNU/Linux has their own series of packages that are (what I gathered glacing at their site) supposed to be libre.
---
� Synchronet � KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
Re: I have decided to switch to Parabola GNU/Linux.
By: Deavmi to DOVE-Net.Unix on Wed Dec 14 2016 09:03 pm
I have decided to switch to Parabola GNU/Linux.
The reason for doing this is because as a developer I need the latest available packages and Parabola (being an Arch-based distribution) has this wonderful gift. I just checked tonight that the version of python tney have available on their package server is the same as the latest version available from python.org; so that's great.
I will be learning how to use the package manager, pacman, tonight as I have always been an apt-get guy.
I would be interested to see what your thoughts are on Parabola GNU/Linux. I just looked at it briefly (just their website) and I see that AUR is not supported; which is interesting for it being a variant of Arch Linux.
For me, I would like to have access to the AUR to get packages that Arch Linux
does not have available on their mainstream repositories; probably why Manjaro
works out well for me.
For me being a former RPM person, I kind of find it weird to use pacman for a while.
To install: pacman --sync seamonkey
To update the package cache: pacman --sync --refresh --refresh
No, that is not a typo or an accidential repeat. The "refresh" parameter has to be included twice. And yes, at least for Arch Linux and Manjaro, package cache will need to be updated from time to time (otherwise, you might get a 404
error).
Oh, and to update all of the packages: pacman --sync --refresh --refresh --sysupgrade
That command will update the package cach and then performan the updates against all of the packages.
Yea... Pacman is interesting, and it looks like Parabola GNU/Linux has their own series of packages that are (what I gathered glacing at their site) supposed to be libre.
---
� Synchronet � KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
On 2016-12-15 01:28 AM, jagossel wrote:I know what I will be studying today. :)
Re: I have decided to switch to Parabola GNU/Linux.I have never seen such a weird package manager until now.
By: Deavmi to DOVE-Net.Unix on Wed Dec 14 2016 09:03 pm
I have decided to switch to Parabola GNU/Linux.as I
The reason for doing this is because as a developer I need the latest
available packages and Parabola (being an Arch-based distribution) has
this wonderful gift. I just checked tonight that the version of python
tney have available on their package server is the same as the latest
version available from python.org; so that's great.
I will be learning how to use the package manager, pacman, tonight
have always been an apt-get guy.
I would be interested to see what your thoughts are on Parabola
GNU/Linux. I
just looked at it briefly (just their website) and I see that AUR is not
supported; which is interesting for it being a variant of Arch Linux.
For me, I would like to have access to the AUR to get packages that
Arch Linux
does not have available on their mainstream repositories; probably why
Manjaro
works out well for me.
For me being a former RPM person, I kind of find it weird to use
pacman for a
while.
To install: pacman --sync seamonkey
To update the package cache: pacman --sync --refresh --refresh
No, that is not a typo or an accidential repeat. The "refresh"
parameter has
to be included twice. And yes, at least for Arch Linux and Manjaro,
package
cache will need to be updated from time to time (otherwise, you might
get a 404
error).
Oh, and to update all of the packages: pacman --sync --refresh --refresh
--sysupgrade
That command will update the package cach and then performan the updates
against all of the packages.
Yea... Pacman is interesting, and it looks like Parabola GNU/Linux has
their
own series of packages that are (what I gathered glacing at their site)
supposed to be libre.
---
� Synchronet � KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net,
Chatsworth GA US
I come from apt-get you know, so yeah. Even yum or dnf is fine but wow, pacman, from what you've shown me is frikken weird.
pacman -S seamonkey, does the same thing.
pacman -Syu, will do the same thing. No need to type everything out.
I have never seen such a weird package manager until now.
I come from apt-get you know, so yeah. Even yum or dnf is fine but wow, pacman, from what you've shown me is frikken weird.
I come from apt-get you know, so yeah. Even yum or dnf is fine but
wow, pacman, from what you've shown me is frikken weird.
As Accession pointed out, there are short-hand versions as well:
- -S for installing
- -Syu for upgrading
I am used to typing out the longer version of parameters for my
benefit. I mean, honestly, I still unarchive TAR.GZ files like this:
tar --verbose --gzip --extract --file sometarball.tar.gz
Re: I have decided to switch to Parabola GNU/Linux.
By: Accession to jagossel on Wed Dec 14 2016 08:28 pm
pacman -S seamonkey, does the same thing.
pacman -Syu, will do the same thing. No need to type everything out.
Good point; in my case, I am used to typing everything out and I completely forgot about the short-hand version of those parameters.
---
� Synchronet � KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
Sysop: | Chris Crash |
---|---|
Location: | Huntington Beach, CA. |
Users: | 585 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 27:07:37 |
Calls: | 10,757 |
Files: | 5 |
Messages: | 452,132 |